FIN 320 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
Final Project Part I
Part I Overview
Business professionals typically need to demonstrate a core set of financial knowledge to earn the job and to succeed on a job. For this part of the assessment, you will be given a scenario in which you are asked to illustrate your financial management knowledge.
This part of the final project addresses the following course outcomes:
· Analyze the roles and responsibilities of financial managers in confirming compliance with federal and shareholder requirements
· Differentiate between various financial markets and institutions by comparing and contrasting options when selecting appropriate private and corporate investments
Part I Prompt
You have completed an internship in the finance division of a fast-growing information technology corporation. Your boss, the financial manager, is considering hiring you for a full-time job. He first wants to evaluate your financial knowledge and has provided you with a short examination. When composing your answers to this employment examination, ensure that they are cohesive and read like a short essay.
Your submission must address the following critical elements:
I. Analyze Roles and Responsibilities for Compliance
A. Examine the types of decisions financial managers make. How are these decisions related to the primary objective of financial managers?
B. Analyze the various ethical issues a financial manager could potentially face and how these could be handled.
C. Compare and contrast the different federal safeguards that are in place to reduce financial reporting abuse. Why are these consideredappropriate safeguards?
II. Investment Options
A. If a private company is “going public,” what does this mean, and how would the company do this? What are the advantages of doing this? Do you see any disadvantages? If so, what are they?
B. How do the largest U.S. stock markets differ? Out of those choices, which would be the smartest private investment option, in your opinion? Why?
C. Compare and contrast the various investment products that are available and the types of institutions that sell them.
Final Project Part I Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Ensure that your employment examination is submitted as one comprehensive and cohesive short essay. It should use doublespacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Citations should be formatted according to APA style.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information,review these instructions.
Critical Elements |
Exemplary (100%) |
Proficient (85%) |
Needs Improvement (55%) |
Not Evident (0%) |
Value |
Roles and |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Comprehensively examines the |
Examines the types of decisions |
Does not examine the types of |
15.83 |
Responsibilities: |
includes examples in analysis |
types of decisions financial |
financial managers make, |
decisions financial managers |
|
Examine |
|
managers make, including how |
including how these decisions are |
make |
|
|
|
these decisions are related to |
related to their primary objective, |
|
|
|
|
their primary objective |
but examination is not |
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Roles and |
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and |
Comprehensively analyzes the |
Analyzes the various ethical issues |
Does not analyze the various |
15.83 |
Responsibilities: |
analysis indicates a clear |
various ethical issues a financial |
a financial manager could |
ethical issues a financial manager |
|
Analyze |
understanding of ethical |
manager could potentially face |
potentially face and how these |
could potentially face and how |
|
|
standards in finance |
and how these issues could be |
issues could be handled, but |
these issues could be handled |
|
|
|
handled |
analysis is not comprehensive |
|
|
Roles and |
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and |
Accurately analyzes different |
Analyzes different federal |
Does not analyze different federal |
15.83 |
Responsibilities: |
analysis indicates a clear |
federal safeguards that are in |
safeguards that are in place to |
safeguards |
|
Compare and Contrast |
understanding of federal |
place to reduce financial |
reduce financial reporting abuse, |
|
|
|
safeguards in finance |
reporting abuse, including why |
but analysis is inaccurate or |
|
|
|
|
these safeguards are appropriate |
cursory, or analysis of why these |
|
|
|
|
|
safeguards are appropriate is |
|
|
|
|
|
inaccurate or cursory |
|
|
Investment: Private |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Comprehensively compares and |
Compares and contrasts the |
Does not compare and contrast |
15.83 |
Company |
includes examples in analysis |
contrasts the advantages and |
advantages and disadvantages of |
the advantages and |
|
|
|
disadvantages of a company |
a company “going public” versus |
disadvantages of a company |
|
|
|
“going public” versus staying |
staying private, but analysis is not |
“going public” versus staying |
|
|
|
private |
comprehensive |
private |
|
Investment: U.S. Stock |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Comprehensively and accurately |
Differentiates between the |
Does not differentiate between |
15.83 |
Markets |
explains choice of smartest stock |
differentiates between the largest |
largest U.S. stock markets, but |
the largest U.S. stock markets |
|
|
market to invest private money |
U.S. stock markets and indicates |
analysis is inaccurate or cursory |
|
|
|
into |
choice of smartest stock market |
or is missing choice of smartest |
|
|
|
|
to invest private money into |
stock market to invest private |
|
|
|
|
|
money into |
|
|
Investment: Compare |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Comprehensively compares and |
Compares and contrasts the |
Does not compare and contrast |
15.83 |
and Contrast |
includes both foreign and |
contrasts the various investment |
various investment products and |
the various investment products |
|
|
domestic institutions |
products available and the types |
the types of institutions that sell |
and the types of institutions that |
|
|
|
of institutions that sell them |
them, but analysis is not |
sell them |
|
|
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Articulation of |
Submission is free of errors |
Submission has no major errors |
Submission has major errors |
Submission has critical errors |
5.02 |
Response |
related to citations, grammar, |
related to citations, grammar, |
related to citations, grammar, |
related to citations, grammar, |
|
|
spelling, syntax, and organization |
spelling, syntax, or organization |
spelling, syntax, or organization |
spelling, syntax, or organization |
|
|
and is presented in a professional |
|
that negatively impact readability |
that prevent understanding of |
|
|
and easy to read format |
|
and articulation of main ideas |
ideas |
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Total |
100% |
Final Project Part II
Part II Overview
For this part of the final project, you will be given a scenario in which you are asked to illustrate your financial computation and analysis skills.
This part of the assessment addresses the following course outcomes:
· Compute financial ratios, time value, variables, and returns using industry standard tools for optimizing financial success
· Analyze corporate financial data for multiple companies in evaluating past and future financial performances
Part II Prompt
For this section of your employment exam, you will select two companies. The first company needs to come from your TDAU thinkorswim portfolio. The second needs to be a competitor of the first company from the same industry. You will be responsible for collecting, synthesizing, and making decisions regarding both companies. After evaluating these companies’ financial data, you will then decide which company’s stock is the better investment.
This section of your employment examination must be submitted in two parts. Part A will contain the workbooks that house all of your quantitative data and formulas, along with any of the information that is relevant for your chosen companies. Part B will contain your answers to the questions asked below, composed in a cohesive manner. If you are referring to data that is found within the workbooks in Part A, be sure to include a citation—for example, “rate of return is 3.570 USD (E64, WB2),” where E64 is the cell that the calculation took place in and WB2 is designating “workbook 2.” This ensures that your instructor can quickly and accurately check data entry, formula use, and financial calculations.
Your submission must address the following critical elements:
I. Preparing the Workbooks
A. Download the annual income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements for the last three completed fiscal years for your chosencompanies. This information must be included in your final submission.
B. Prepare a worksheet for each of the companies to display their financial data for the last three fiscal years. Ensure your data is accurate and organized. Include these worksheets as a workbook in your final submission.
C. Find historical stock prices for both companies and add this information to the respective spreadsheets. Consider the appropriate date range you should use.
II. Three-Year Returns
A. What is the three-year return on the stock price of the first company (Company A)? How is the stock performing? Ensure that you use the appropriate formula in your spreadsheets to calculate the three-year return on the given company’s stock price.
B. What is the three-year return on the stock price of the second company (Company B)? How is this stock performing? Ensure that you use the appropriate formula in your spreadsheets to calculate the three-year return on your chosen company’s stock price.
C. How do these two stocks compare in terms of three-year returns? What does this indicate about these two companies?
III. Financial Calculations
A. Using the appropriate spreadsheets, which are to be included in the workbooks, calculate the price-to-earnings ratio for the last three fiscal years of the given and your chosen companies. Be sure that you are entering and using the correct formula.
B. Using the appropriate spreadsheets, which are to be included in the workbooks, calculate the debt-to-equity ratios for the last three fiscal years of the given and your chosen companies. Be sure that you are entering and using the correct formula.
C. Using the appropriate spreadsheets, which are to be included in the workbooks, calculate the return-on-equity ratios for the last three fiscal years of the given and your chosen companies. Be sure that you are entering and using the correct formula.
D. Using the appropriate spreadsheets, which are to be included in the workbooks, calculate the return on assets for the last three fiscal years of the given and your chosen companies. Be sure that you are entering and using the correct formula.
E. Using the appropriate spreadsheets, which are to be included in the workbooks, calculate the profit margins for the last three fiscal years of the given and your chosen companies. Be sure that you are entering and using the correct formula.
F. Using the appropriate spreadsheets, which are to be included in the workbooks, calculate the free cash flows for the last three fiscal years of the given and your chosen companies. Be sure that you are entering and using the correct formula.
IV. Industry Averages
A. Obtain current industry averages of three of the financial calculations above for both companies and add this information to your spreadsheet for comparison. Ensure the accuracy and organization of your data.
B. In this context, how is each company’s financial health? How do these two companies compare to one another? Consider the appropriate date range you should use.
V. Performance Over Time
A. Analyze the performance of the Company A over time. What financial strengths and weaknesses does this company have? Consider addressing the free cash flows and ratios you calculated earlier.
B. Analyze the performance of your Company B over time. What financial strengths and weaknesses does this company have? Consider addressing the free cash flows and ratios you calculated earlier.
C. Analyze how the data differ between these two companies. Why do you think this is? Consider addressing the free cash flows and ratios you calculated earlier.
VI. Investment
A. Are the companies considered growth or value companies? Why?
B. Which company’s stock is the better investment? Consider supporting your answer with data.
Final Project Part II Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: This part of the final project will be submitted in two parts. Part A will contain the workbooks that house all of your quantitative data andformulas, along with any of the information that is relevant for your chosen company. Part B will contain your answers to the prompts, composed in a cohesive manner. Part B should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Citations should be formatted according to APA style.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information,review these instructions.
Critical Elements |
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Needs Improvement |
Not Evident |
Value |
Preparing: Download |
|
Downloads and includes annual |
Downloads and includes annual income |
Does not download and include |
2 |
|
|
income statements, balance |
statements, balance sheets, and cash |
annual income statements, |
|
|
|
sheets, and cash flow |
flow statements for chosen companies |
balance sheets, and cash flow |
|
|
|
statements for the last three |
but is missing various components |
statements for the last three |
|
|
|
fiscal years for chosen |
(55%) |
fiscal years for chosen |
|
|
|
companies (100%) |
|
companies (0%) |
|
Preparing: Worksheet |
|
Prepares worksheet for chosen |
Prepares worksheet for chosen and |
Does not prepare worksheets |
2 |
|
|
and given companies, |
given companies, displaying financial |
for both the chosen and given |
|
|
|
displaying all financial data for |
data for the last three fiscal years, but |
companies (0%) |
|
|
|
the last three fiscal years in an |
worksheets are unorganized, inaccurate, |
|
|
|
|
accurate and organized manner |
or incomplete (55%) |
|
|
|
|
(100%) |
|
|
|
Preparing: Stock Prices |
|
Adds historical stock prices for |
Adds historical stock prices for the |
Does not add historical stock |
2 |
|
|
an appropriate date range for |
chosen and given companies, but data |
prices for the given and chosen |
|
|
|
the chosen and given |
has been inaccurately entered or is not |
companies to their respective |
|
|
|
companies to their respective |
for an appropriate date range (55%) |
worksheets (0%) |
|
|
|
worksheets (100%) |
|
|
|
Returns: Company A |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Correctly calculates the three- |
Calculates the three-year return on the |
Does not calculate the three- |
5.63 |
|
logically explains reasoning |
year return on the stock price |
stock price of the given company, but |
year return on the stock price of |
|
|
behind indication of stock |
of the given company and |
calculation is incorrect or indication of |
the given company (0%) |
|
|
performance (100%) |
accurately indicates how this |
how this stock is performing is |
|
|
|
|
stock is performing (85%) |
inaccurate or missing (55%) |
|
|
Returns: Company B |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Correctly calculates the three- |
Calculates the three-year return on the |
Does not calculate the three- |
5.63 |
|
logically explains reasoning |
year return on the stock price |
stock price of the chosen company, but |
year return on the stock price of |
|
|
behind indication of stock |
of the chosen company and |
calculation is incorrect or indication of |
the chosen company (0%) |
|
|
performance (100%) |
accurately indicates how this |
how this stock is performing is |
|
|
|
|
stock is performing (85%) |
inaccurate or missing (55%) |
|
|
Returns: Compare |
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and |
Compares the three-year |
Compares the three-year returns of the |
Does not compare the three- |
6.43 |
|
explanation demonstrates |
returns of the given and chosen |
given and chosen companies, but |
year returns of the given and |
|
|
nuanced understanding of |
companies, explaining what |
explanation of what this indicates about |
chosen companies (0%) |
|
|
three-year returns and their |
this indicates about each |
each company is cursory or missing |
|
|
|
implications (100%) |
company (85%) |
(55%) |
|
|
Calculations: Price-to- |
|
Correctly calculates the price- |
Calculates the price-to-earnings ratios of |
Does not calculate the price-to- |
5.63 |
Earnings Ratios |
|
to-earnings ratios for the last |
the given and chosen companies, but |
earnings ratios of the given and |
|
|
|
three fiscal years of the given |
calculations are incorrect or do not |
chosen companies (0%) |
|
|
|
and chosen companies (100%) |
consider the last three fiscal years (55%) |
|
|
Calculations: Debt-to- |
|
Correctly calculates the debt- |
Calculates the debt-to-equity ratios of |
Does not calculate the debt-to- |
5.63 |
Equity Ratios |
|
to-equity ratios for the last |
the given and chosen companies, but |
equity ratios of the given and |
|
|
|
three fiscal years of the given |
calculations are incorrect or do not |
chosen companies (0%) |
|
|
|
and chosen companies (100%) |
consider the last three fiscal years (55%) |
|
|
Calculations: Return- |
|
Correctly calculates the return- |
Calculates the return-on-equity ratios of |
Does not calculate the return- |
5.63 |
on-Equity Ratios |
|
on-equity ratios for the last |
the given and chosen companies, but |
on-equity ratios of the given and |
|
|
|
three fiscal years of the given |
calculations are incorrect or do not |
chosen companies (0%) |
|
|
|
and chosen companies (100%) |
consider the last three fiscal years (55%) |
|
|
Calculations: Return on |
|
Correctly calculates the return |
Calculates the return on assets of the |
Does not calculate the return on |
5.63 |
Assets |
|
on assets for the last three |
given and chosen companies, but |
assets ratios of the given and |
|
|
|
fiscal years of the given and |
calculations are incorrect or do not |
chosen companies (0%) |
|
|
|
chosen companies (100%) |
consider the last three fiscal years (55%) |
|
|
Calculations: Profit |
|
Correctly calculates the profit |
Calculates the profit margins of the |
Does not calculate the profit |
5.63 |
Margins |
|
margins for the last three fiscal |
given and chosen companies, but |
margins of the given and chosen |
|
|
|
years of the given and chosen |
calculations are incorrect or do not |
companies (0%) |
|
|
|
companies (100%) |
consider the last three fiscal years (55%) |
|
|
Calculations: Free Cash |
|
Correctly calculates the free |
Calculates the free cash flows of the |
Does not calculate the free cash |
5.63 |
Flows |
|
cash flows for the last three |
given and chosen companies, but |
flows of the given and chosen |
|
|
|
fiscal years of the given and |
calculations are incorrect or do not |
companies (0%) |
|
|
|
chosen companies (100%) |
consider the last three fiscal years (55%) |
|
|
Industry Averages: |
|
Adds current industry averages |
Adds current industry averages for |
Does not add current industry |
2 |
Industry Averages |
|
for chosen and given |
chosen and given companies to |
averages for chosen and given |
|
|
|
companies to worksheet in an |
worksheets, but some data is |
companies to worksheets (0%) |
|
|
|
accurate and organized manner |
inaccurate, unorganized, or missing |
|
|
|
|
(100%) |
(55%) |
|
|
Industry Averages: |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Analyzes the given and chosen |
Analyzes the given and chosen |
Does not analyze the given and |
6.43 |
Financial Health |
includes current industry |
companies’ financial health by |
companies’ financial health by |
chosen companies’ financial |
|
|
averages within an appropriate |
comparing the two companies’ |
comparing the two companies’ industry |
health (0%) |
|
|
date range (100%) |
current industry averages |
averages but does not consider the |
|
|
|
|
(85%) |
current industry rates (55%) |
|
|
Performance: Company |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Comprehensively analyzes the |
Analyzes the strengths and weaknesses |
Does not analyze the strengths |
6.43 |
A |
references free cash flow and |
strengths and weaknesses of |
of the given company over time, but |
and weaknesses of the given |
|
|
ratios calculated for the given |
the given company over time |
analysis is not comprehensive (55%) |
company over time (0%) |
|
|
company in analysis (100%) |
(85%) |
|
|
|
Performance: Company |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Comprehensively analyzes the |
Analyzes the strengths and weaknesses |
Does not analyze the strengths |
6.43 |
B |
references free cash flow and |
strengths and weaknesses of |
of the chosen company over time, but |
and weaknesses of the chosen |
|
|
ratios calculated for the chosen |
the chosen company over time |
analysis is not comprehensive (55%) |
company over time (0%) |
|
|
company in analysis (100%) |
(85%) |
|
|
|
Performance: Differ |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Accurately contrasts the |
Contrasts the performances of the given |
Does not contrast the |
6.43 |
|
references the companies’ free |
performances of the given and |
and chosen companies over time, but |
performances of the given and |
|
|
cash flows and ratios calculated |
chosen companies over time, |
analysis is inaccurate or cursory, or the |
chosen companies over time |
|
|
in analysis (100%) |
including a logical, proposed |
included explanation of these |
(0%) |
|
|
|
explanation of these |
performances is illogical or cursory |
|
|
|
|
performances (85%) |
(55%) |
|
|
Investment: Growth or |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Comprehensively analyzes |
Analyzes whether the companies are |
Does not analyze whether the |
6.43 |
Value |
includes quantitative data to |
whether the companies are |
considered growth or value companies, |
companies are considered |
|
|
support analysis (100%) |
considered growth or value |
but analysis is not comprehensive, or |
growth or value companies (0%) |
|
|
|
companies, including a logical |
the explanation included is illogical or |
|
|
|
|
explanation of why (85%) |
cursory (55%) |
|
|
Investment: Stock |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Analyzes each company’s stock, |
Analyzes each company’s stock, |
Does not analyze each |
6.43 |
|
includes quantitative data to |
including a logical explanation |
including an explanation of personal |
company’s stock (0%) |
|
|
support analysis (100%) |
of personal preference of |
preference of stock options, but analysis |
|
|
|
|
which stock to purchase (85%) |
or explanation is illogical or cursory |
|
|
|
|
|
(55%) |
|
|
Articulation of |
Submission is free of errors |
Submission has no major errors |
Submission has major errors related to |
Submission has critical errors |
1.95 |
Response |
related to citations, grammar, |
related to citations, grammar, |
citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or |
related to citations, grammar, |
|
|
spelling, syntax, and |
spelling, syntax, or organization |
organization that negatively impact |
spelling, syntax, or organization |
|
|
organization and is presented in |
(85%) |
readability and articulation of main |
that prevent understanding of |
|
|
a professional and easy to read |
|
ideas (55%) |
ideas (0%) |
|
|
format (100%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Total |
100% |
Final Project Part III
Part III Overview
To make corporate finance decisions, take an advanced finance course, or pursue a career in finance, you will need to understand basic concepts. This includes going beyond the number crunching and reading graphs in order to analyze various financial indicators. This analysis can lead to many important decisions in your financial career. For this part of the final project, you will be given a scenario in which you are asked to illustrate your financial knowledge and analysis skills.
This part of the assessment addresses the following course outcomes:
· Analyze the roles and responsibilities of financial managers in confirming compliance with federal and shareholder requirements
· Differentiate between various financial markets and institutions by comparing and contrasting options when selecting appropriate private and corporate investments
· Compute financial ratios, time value, variables, and returns using industry standard tools for optimizing financial success
· Analyze corporate financial data for multiple companies in evaluating past and future financial performances
Part III Prompt
The results of both sections of your employment examination have finally been received, and you were offered the position. You have a few important decisions to make before you can formally accept or decline the position. When composing your answers to these decisions, ensure that they are cohesive and read like a short essay.
Your submission must address the following critical elements:
I. School Versus Work
A. The school you would like to attend costs $100,000. To help finance your education, you need to choose whether or not to sell your 1,000 shares of Apple stock, 1,000 EE Savings Bonds (with $100 denominations and 4.25% coupon rate) that are five years from their 30-year maturity date, or a combination of both. Provide the appropriate data and calculations that you would perform to make this decision.
B. What are the advantages and disadvantages of selling a combination of stocks and bonds? Be sure to support your answers.
C. Suppose that you choose to sell your stocks, bonds, or a combination of both. What is your choice, and what is your financial reasoning behind this choice? Consider supporting your answer with quantitative data.
D. Suppose that you choose to accept the job. What is your financial reasoning behind this choice? Be sure to support your answer with quantitative data.
II. Bonus Versus Stock
A. The company has offered you a $5,000 bonus, which you may receive today, or 100 shares of the company’s stock, which has a current stock price of $50 per share. Mathematically, what is the best choice? Why?
B. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each option? Be sure to support your answers.
C. What would you ultimately choose to do? What is your financial reasoning behind this choice? Consider supporting your answer with quantitative data.
III. Compliance
A. While investigating the shares offered to you by your potential boss, you discover that the company you are considering working for is not registered as required under the Securities Act of 1933. How does this influence you as a potential employee and as a potential shareholder? Be sure to reference any applicable statutes or laws.
B. You know that accepting this job may eventually lead to a promotion into the role of the financial manager. As the potential financial manager, what federal and shareholder requirements would you need to be familiar with in order to ensure that you are being completely compliant?
Final Project Part III Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Please ensure that your decision plan is submitted as one comprehensive and cohesive short essay. It should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Citations should be formatted according to APA style.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information,review these instructions.
Critical Elements |
Exemplary |
Proficient |
Needs Improvement |
Not Evident |
Value |
School Versus Work: |
|
Accurately calculates the worth |
Calculates the worth of stocks, |
Does not calculate the worth of |
11.88 |
Finance Your Education |
|
of stocks, bonds, and |
bonds, and combinations of |
stocks, bonds, and combinations |
|
|
|
combinations of stocks and |
stocks and bonds, but calculation |
of stocks and bonds (0%) |
|
|
|
bonds, including the appropriate |
is inaccurate or appropriate data |
|
|
|
|
data and calculations with |
and/or calculations are not |
|
|
|
|
submission (100%) |
included in submission (55%) |
|
|
School Versus Work: |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Comprehensively differentiates |
Differentiates the advantages and |
Does not differentiate the |
11.88 |
Advantages and |
provides historical data, as well |
the advantages and |
disadvantages of selling a |
advantages and disadvantages of |
|
Disadvantages |
as quantitative data, to support |
disadvantages of selling a |
combination of stocks and bonds, |
selling a combination of stocks |
|
|
answer (100%) |
combination of stocks and bonds |
but analysis is not comprehensive |
and bonds (0%) |
|
|
|
and provides support for answer |
or support is cursory or missing |
|
|
|
|
(85%) |
(55%) |
|
|
School Versus Work: |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Examines choice to sell stocks, |
Examines choice to sell stocks, |
Does not examine choice to sell |
7.92 |
Choose to Sell |
supports examination with |
bonds, or combination of both, |
bonds, or combination of both, |
stocks, bonds, or combination of |
|
|
quantitative data (100%) |
explaining the financial |
but explanation of the financial |
both (0%) |
|
|
|
reasoning behind the choice |
reasoning behind the choice is |
|
|
|
|
(85%) |
cursory or missing (55%) |
|
|
School Versus Work: |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Examines choice to accept the |
Examines choice to accept the |
Does not examine choice to |
7.92 |
Accept the Job |
supports examination with |
job, explaining the financial |
job, but explanation of the |
accept the job (0%) |
|
|
quantitative data (100%) |
reasoning behind the choice |
financial reasoning behind the |
|
|
|
|
(85%) |
choice is cursory or missing (55%) |
|
|
Bonus Versus Stock: |
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and |
Accurately calculates the best |
Calculates the best choice of |
Does not calculate the best choice |
11.88 |
Offered |
explanation of the best choice |
choice of receiving a cash bonus |
receiving a cash bonus versus |
of receiving a cash bonus versus |
|
|
demonstrates nuanced |
versus receiving company stock, |
receiving company stock, but |
receiving company stock (0%) |
|
|
understanding of the time-value |
including an explanation of the |
calculation is inaccurate or |
|
|
|
of money (100%) |
best choice (85%) |
explanation of best choice is |
|
|
|
|
|
cursory or missing (55%) |
|
|
Bonus Versus Stock: |
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and |
Comprehensively analyzes the |
Analyzes the advantages and |
Does not analyze the advantages |
11.88 |
Advantages and |
analysis includes quantitative |
advantages and disadvantages of |
disadvantages of the cash and |
or disadvantages of the cash and |
|
Disadvantages |
data (100%) |
the cash and stock options, |
stock options, but analysis is not |
stock options (0%) |
|
|
|
supporting each option (85%) |
comprehensive or support for |
|
|
|
|
|
each option is cursory or missing |
|
|
|
|
|
(55%) |
|
|
Bonus Versus Stock: |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Chooses cash or stock option, |
Chooses cash or stock option, |
Does not choose cash or stock |
7.92 |
Choose |
supports choice with |
including logical financial |
including financial reasoning |
option (0%) |
|
|
quantitative data (100%) |
reasoning behind the choice |
behind the choice, but reasoning |
|
|
|
|
(85%) |
is illogical or missing (55%) |
|
|
Compliance: |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and |
Comprehensively analyzes the |
Analyzes the influence of |
Does not analyze the influence of |
11.88 |
Investigating |
references demonstrate |
influence of noncompliance on |
noncompliance on potential |
noncompliance on potential |
|
|
knowledge of current events in |
potential employees and |
employees and potential |
employees or potential |
|
|
finance (100%) |
potential shareholders, including |
shareholders, but analysis is not |
shareholders (0%) |
|
|
|
references to statutes and laws |
comprehensive or support does |
|
|
|
|
in analysis (85%) |
not include references to statutes |
|
|
|
|
|
or laws (55%) |
|
|
Compliance: Accepting |
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and |
Comprehensively analyzes the |
Analyzes the federal and |
Does not analyze the federal and |
11.88 |
|
analysis demonstrates nuanced |
federal and shareholder |
shareholder requirements |
shareholder requirements |
|
|
understanding of requirements |
requirements necessary for a |
necessary for a financial manager |
necessary for a financial manager |
|
|
for compliance with federal laws |
financial manager to become |
to become familiar with in order |
to become familiar with in order |
|
|
(100%) |
familiar with in order to ensure |
to ensure compliance, but |
to ensure compliance (0%) |
|
|
|
compliance (85%) |
analysis is not comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
(55%) |
|
|
Articulation of |
Submission is free of errors |
Submission has no major errors |
Submission has major errors |
Submission has critical errors |
4.96 |
Response |
related to citations, grammar, |
related to citations, grammar, |
related to citations, grammar, |
related to citations, grammar, |
|
|
spelling, syntax, and |
spelling, syntax, or organization |
spelling, syntax, or organization |
spelling, syntax, or organization |
|
|
organization and is presented in |
(85%) |
that negatively impact readability |
that prevent understanding of |
|
|
a professional and easy to read |
|
and articulation of main ideas |
ideas (0%) |
|
|
format (100%) |
|
(55%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Total |
100% |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more