Running head: NEUROBIOLOGY OF OCD 1
NEUROBIOLOGY OF OCD 2
Neurobiological Substrates of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Your Name
Department of Psychology, Liberty University
Neurobiological Substrates of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
I. Introduction
A. Identify the purpose of your paper
B. Summarize your (at least 3) main points
C. Describe why your paper is interesting/useful/meaningful to your target audience (i.e., other experts in the field)
D. Present your thesis statement
II. Body (a.k.a. Argument)
A. State Main Point #1 (in a complete sentence)
1. Describe Supporting Fact #1 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
2. Describe Supporting Fact #2 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
3. Describe Supporting Fact #3 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
B. State Main Point #2 (in a complete sentence)
1. Describe Supporting Fact #1 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
2. Describe Supporting Fact #2 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
3. Describe Supporting Fact #3 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
C. State Main Point # 3 (in a complete sentence)
1. Describe Supporting Fact #1 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
2. Describe Supporting Fact #2 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
3. Describe Supporting Fact #3 (Cite the journal article(s) where you got this finding/idea).
a. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
b. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
c. Provide details from the article(s) to effectively support the points being made.
D. Continue as above until you have covered all of the Main Points in your argument.
III. Conclusion
A. Restate Thesis (in slightly different words to remain interesting)
B. Summarize Your Main Points (also in slightly different words…)
C. Discuss Implications for a Christian Worldview
1. Discuss the relationship among the causes of the disease/disorder, original sin, and living in a fallen world. Use a relevant scriptural citation to support your rationale.
2. Discuss whether or not neuropsychological assessment is a Biblically-supported practice that Christian professionals can use to serve others. Use a relevant scriptural citation to support your rationale.
3. Discuss whether or not the typical methods used to treat the disease/disorder are consistent with a Christian worldview. Use a relevant scriptural citation to support your rationale.
References
Baxter, L.R., Schwartz, J.M., Mazziotta, J.C.; Phelps, M.E., Pahl, J.J., Guze, B.H. & Fairbanks, L. (1998). Cerebral glucose metabolic rates in nondepressed patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder.
American Journal of Psychiatry,
145, 1560–1563. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810210048007
Baxter, L.R., Schwartz, J.M.; Bergman, K.S., & Szuba, M.P. (1992). Caudate glucose metabolic rate changes with both drug and behavior therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder.
American Journal of Psychiatry,
49(9). 1559–1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4927(99)0051-7
Busatto, G.F., Zamignani, D.R., Buchpiguel, C.A., Garrido, G.E.J., Glabus, M.F., Rocha, E.T., Maia, A.F., Rasario-Campos, M.C., Castro, C.C., Furuie, S.S., Gutierrez, M.A., McGuire, P.K., & Miguel, E.C. (2000). A voxel-based investigation of regional cerebral blood flow abnormalities in obsessive–compulsive disorder using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging,
99(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4927(00)00050-0
Ebert, D., Speck, O., Konig, A., Berger, M., Hennig, J., & Hohagen, F. (1997). 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy in obsessive–compulsive disorder: evidence for neuronal loss in the cingulate gyrus and the right striatum.
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging,
74, 173–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4927(97)00016-4
Hansen, E.S., Hasselbalch, S., Law, I., & Bolwig, T.G. (2002). The caudate nucleus in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Reduced metabolism following treatment with paroxetine: a PET study.
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology,
5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145701002681
Nordahl, T.E., Benkelfat, C., Semple, W.E., Gross, M., King, A.C., & Cohen, R.M. (1998). Cerebral glucose metabolic rates in obsessive compulsive disorder.
Neuropsychopharmacology,
2, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4927(99)00040-2
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more