IHP 670 Module Seven Program Critique Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
You will complete �ve program critique assignments in the course to support your work as you prepare for your �nal project. These assignments ask that you critique a program described
within an identi�ed article located in the module’s resources. These articles were chosen because they relate to the module’s topics and demonstrate some common problems that programs
encounter. In each assignment, you will have the opportunity to critique certain program components, such as resources, activities, outcome measures, use of feedback loops, assumptions, and
external barriers. Once planners have identi�ed the details for each of the program components, they must step back and assess how those components can best operate within the program’s
environment. That involves considering concepts such as cultural competency, systems thinking, ethical practice, and others. You will focus on these different concepts, in turn, through the
program critiques. As you develop your program critique skills, you will be asked to identify areas that could be or need to be improved and offer recommendations.
In this assignment, you will critique a health or healthcare program using the program critique reading in the Resources section of this module. The reading portrays example program decision-
making relevant to module content. The selected program critique reading is the required reading for this assignment. For this assignment, you will identify the activities used to achieve
cultural competence. Then, you will explain whether the given program satis�es the four key ethical principles. Finally, you will describe additional activities that would help ensure the
program has met the principles of social justice.
This assignment will help you analyze how your program is expected to address cultural competence and satisfy key ethical and social justice principles. It will also ask you to consider the
importance of health literacy when interacting with targeted populations. You will use �ndings from this assignment to improve your strategy to address cultural competence in your program.
Prompt
Write a program critique that examines a health or healthcare program designed to improve self-management for individuals living with chronic disease. As you develop your critique, assess
the program’s design to achieve cultural competence. Determine if each of the four key ethical principles were satis�ed and if the principles of social justice were considered.
Speci�cally, you must address the following rubric criteria:
1. Social Justice Principles: Determine whether the program considered principles of social justice, providing examples to support your claims. Consider the following questions to guide
your response:
Which principles of social justice were met and which weren’t? Justify your rationale.
What activities would you add to improve this aspect of the program?
2. Key Ethical Principles: Explain whether the program satis�ed the four key ethical principles required of program designs, providing examples to support your claims. Consider the
following questions to guide your response:
Why is designing and evaluating a program in an ethical manner important?
What improvements would you suggest for this program to ensure it adheres to ethical principles?
3. Cultural Competence: Determine whether the program adequately addressed cultural competence, explaining your rationale. Consider the following questions to guide your response:
What additional activities would you suggest to address cultural competence in the given program?
Do you believe the program’s cultural competence activities impacted the outcomes? Why or why not?
4. Summary and Recommendations: Summarize your �ndings from the program analysis and share your recommendations to improve the consideration of cultural competence, social
justice, and ethical principles. Consider the following question to guide your response:
What would you do differently to ensure the given program satis�es key ethical and social justice principles and addresses cultural competency?
Note that all the claims in your deliverable should be evidence based. Your citations should be from your independent search for evidence (not from the scenario, textbook, or module
resources) of credible sources and be current within the last �ve years. You are required to cite a minimum of two sources overall. Refer to the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate
located in the Start Here section of the course for additional support. If you need writing support, access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course
What to Submit
Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. Also include a title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. You should include a minimum
of two sources. Sources should be cited according to APA style.
Module Seven Program Critique Rubric
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Social Justice Principles Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Determines whether the
program considered principles
of social justice, providing
examples to support claims
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 20
Key Ethical Principles Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Explains whether the program
satis�ed the four key ethical
principles required of program
designs, providing examples to
support claims
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 20
Cultural Competence Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Determines whether the
program adequately addressed
cultural competence, explaining
the rationale
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 20
Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Summary and
Recommendations
Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner, using
industry-speci�c language
Summarizes the �ndings from
the program analysis and
shares recommendations to
improve the consideration of
cultural competence, social
justice, and ethical principles
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors or
omissions
Does not attempt criterion 15
Articulation of Response Exceeds pro�ciency in an
exceptionally clear and
insightful manner
Clearly conveys meaning with
correct grammar, sentence
structure, and spelling,
demonstrating an
understanding of audience and
purpose
Shows progress toward
pro�ciency, but with errors in
grammar, sentence structure,
and spelling, negatively
impacting readability
Submission has critical errors in
grammar, sentence structure,
and spelling, preventing
understanding of ideas
10
Professional Sources Incorporates more than two
professional, current (within
the last �ve years) sources, or
use of sources is exceptionally
insightful
Incorporates two professional,
current (within the last �ve
years) sources that support
claims
Incorporates fewer than two
professional, current (within
the last �ve years) sources, or
not all sources support claims
Does not incorporate sources 10
APA Style Formats in-text citations and
reference list according to APA
style with no errors
Formats in-text citations and
reference list according to APA
style with fewer than �ve
errors
Formats in-text citations and
reference list according to APA
style with �ve or more errors
Does not format in-text
citations and reference list
according to APA style
5
Total: 100%
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more